BYD Song PLUS DM-i vs Geely Galaxy L7: The Ultimate Comparison Guide for Plug-in Hybrid SUVs Under $21,000

If you're budgeting around RMB 150,000 (≈$21,000) and want a plug-in hybrid SUV that’s efficient, spacious, and eligible for China’s green license plates—but can’t decide between the BYD Song PLUS DM-i and the Geely Galaxy L7—you’re not alone. This is one of the most common dilemmas in the 2024–2025 new energy vehicle market. Both are bestsellers, with one emphasizing reliability and the other pushing innovation. In this in-depth, unbiased comparison, we’ll cut through the marketing noise and help you pick the right car for your family—based on real-world performance, not brand loyalty. 😊

I. Quick Overview: Key Differences at a Glance

Note: Fuel economy data sourced from MIIT and official manufacturer announcements; acceleration figures averaged from independent tests by Autohome and Dongchedi.

II. In-Depth Comparison: Which Better Understands Family Needs?

1. Powertrain & Efficiency: Smooth & Economical vs Sporty & Responsive

The BYD Song PLUS DM-i uses BYD’s DM-i Super Hybrid system, which prioritizes electric driving. It pairs a highly efficient 1.5L Atkinson-cycle engine (thermal efficiency of 43%—a measure of how well fuel is converted into usable energy) with an electric motor and a single-speed DHT transmission. The result? Near-silent, EV-like driving in cities, with seamless engine engagement on highways. It’s exceptionally smooth and frugal.

In contrast, the Geely Galaxy L7 features the Thunder Power Hybrid 8848 system, distinguished by its 3-speed DHT Pro transmission. Unlike the DM-i’s single gear ratio, the extra gears allow the engine to operate more efficiently across a wider speed range—especially during highway overtaking, mountain climbs, or when fully loaded. Real-world tests show a 0–100 km/h time of 6.9 seconds, significantly quicker than the Song’s 8.3 seconds. That extra responsiveness builds real confidence on the road. 🚀

However, this complexity comes with minor trade-offs: occasional low-speed jerkiness under low battery conditions and slightly higher fuel consumption when depleted. But in daily use, the difference is negligible.

Verdict: Choose the Song PLUS DM-i for ultimate smoothness, quietness, and simplicity. Go for the Galaxy L7 if you value dynamic performance and frequent high-speed driving. 👍

2. Design & Interior: Timeless Practicality vs Futuristic Tech

The Song PLUS DM-i adopts a conservative, functional design. Its “Dragon Face” front fascia is clean and understated—unlikely to look dated in three years. Inside, the cabin prioritizes usability over flash. The standout feature is the rotatable 12.8-inch center screen, which auto-adjusts between portrait and landscape modes for optimal app compatibility.

The Galaxy L7 takes the opposite approach. With its “Galaxy Light” design language—sealed grille, full-width LED light bar, and split headlights—it looks like it rolled out of a sci-fi concept. Step inside, and you’re greeted by a triple-screen cockpit: digital instrument cluster, main infotainment, and a dedicated 16.2-inch passenger entertainment display. Soft-touch materials, ambient lighting, and metallic accents elevate the perceived quality to segment-leading levels. ✨

But caution: while the passenger screen is fun, it may distract drivers (despite anti-glare tech), and repair costs for multi-screen systems are higher. The Song’s simplicity translates to better long-term reliability and resale value.

Verdict: Prefer practicality and longevity? Pick the Song. Crave cutting-edge ambiance and tech theater? The Galaxy L7 delivers.

3. Space & Comfort: Family-Friendly Dimensions

Both SUVs offer generous interior space, with wheelbases exceeding 2,700 mm (Song: 2,765 mm; Galaxy L7: 2,785 mm). Rear legroom is ample in both—easily accommodating tall passengers. Trunk capacity is nearly identical (Song: ~574 L; Galaxy L7: ~560 L), sufficient for strollers, luggage, or weekend gear.

Where they differ: the Song’s seats are softer and more cushioned, reducing fatigue on long trips. Meanwhile, higher-trim Galaxy L7 models include CDC electromagnetic dampers, offering superior ride comfort over bumps and potholes—though base models use conventional suspension.

Additionally, the Song features a completely flat rear floor, making the middle seat far more comfortable. The Galaxy L7 has a slight tunnel hump, but it’s minor.

Verdict: Space is a tie. For consistent comfort across all trims, the Song wins. If you can afford the top Galaxy L7 trim, its adaptive suspension offers a premium ride. 😊

4. Smart Tech: Infotainment & Driver Assistance

The Galaxy L7 runs Galaxy N OS on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8155 chip, delivering snappy responses, accurate voice recognition (supports four-zone wake-up), and seamless multitasking—especially with its passenger screen and optional AR-HUD. The BYD DiLink system (now upgraded to 8155 in newer models) remains functional but feels dated in UI design and lacks multi-user personalization.

For driver assistance, both offer standard L2 features (adaptive cruise, AEB, lane centering). However, high-end Galaxy L7 trims support NOA (Navigate on Autopilot), enabling automatic lane changes and highway exit navigation—capabilities absent in the current Song PLUS DM-i lineup.

That said, BYD’s OTA updates are slower but more stable; Geely pushes frequent updates but occasionally introduces bugs.

Verdict: Want the latest smart cockpit and highway assist? Choose the Galaxy L7 high trim. Need rock-solid reliability without bells and whistles? The Song is sufficient.

III. Buying Guide: Who Should Choose Which?

🚗 Recommended for BYD Song PLUS DM-i:

1. First-time car buyers who prioritize reliability, nationwide service coverage (>2,000 dealerships), and low maintenance.
2. City commuters with daily drives under 50 km—fully covered by EV mode.
3. Drivers who value calm, linear performance over sportiness.
4. Budget-conscious shoppers—even the base model is well-equipped and cost-effective.

🚀 Recommended for Geely Galaxy L7:

1. Young or growing families who enjoy tech-forward cabins and passenger entertainment.
2. Frequent highway or rural drivers who benefit from 3-speed DHT’s superior high-speed performance.
3. Early adopters willing to pay extra for NOA and advanced driver aids.
4. Style-conscious buyers seeking something distinctive—not another “common” SUV.

IV. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. Which has lower daily running costs in city driving?

Assuming a 40 km daily commute in Beijing, electricity at ¥0.6/kWh, and gasoline at ¥8/L:

• Song PLUS DM-i (115 km version): Fully electric → ~¥7/day (¥210/month).
• Galaxy L7 (115 km version): Similarly electric → ~¥7.5/day (¥225/month).The difference is trivial. In low-battery scenarios, the Song’s 4.5 L/100 km saves ~¥300/year in fuel—insignificant for most households. 😊

2. How do their battery safety technologies compare?

BYD uses its proprietary Blade Battery (LFP chemistry), which passed the nail penetration test without fire or explosion and has powered over 5 million vehicles with no major safety incidents. Geely’s Galaxy L7 offers both NMC and LFP options, all protected by the “Shield” Battery Safety System, which cleared C-AHI’s rigorous tests (nail penetration, seawater immersion, drop impact) and earned the highest C-IASI safety rating for EV batteries. Both are top-tier, but the Blade Battery’s structural integration offers marginally better crash resilience. 👍

3. Which is cheaper to maintain long-term?

Per owner-reported data (Autohome):

• Song PLUS DM-i: Minor service ~¥300; major service ~¥800.
• Galaxy L7: Minor service ~¥350; major service ~¥900.The DM-i’s simpler architecture means fewer parts and lower labor costs. BYD’s extensive dealer network also ensures easier access to service in smaller cities. ⚠️

4. Which holds its value better?

According to the 2024 China Automotive Residual Value Report (China Automobile Dealers Association), the Song PLUS DM-i retains ~68% of its value after three years—the highest among PHEV SUVs. The Galaxy L7, launched mid-2023, lacks full three-year data, but based on Geely’s track record (e.g., Xingyue L), its residual value is estimated at 60–63%. Short-term, BYD has a clear advantage. 📉

5. Is the advertised EV range accurate in winter?

Under sub-zero temperatures (≤0°C), CLTC-rated ranges typically drop to ~70% of claimed values. For example, a 115 km rating yields ~80 km in real winter use. BYD’s strategy prioritizes battery preservation in cold weather, maintaining hybrid efficiency. Geely allows deeper discharge to sustain power output. Independent tests show the Song offers slightly better range stability, while the Galaxy L7 suffers less power loss. Northern buyers should consider the Song’s 150 km variant or opt for battery pre-heating. ❄️

This article was generated by Jiasou Tideflow – AI GEO Automated SEO Marketing System